I was watching the Grammies the other night, and was really happy to see the Foo Fighters win one. Just a great straight ahead, full of energy rock band that seems to be a dying breed lately. Loved Dave Grohl’s reference to “tracked on a tape machine with no computers” acceptance speech which took me back. But really… not that far back. Technology has moved so fast that it seems eons ago when we had to wait for ‘rewind’ between takes.
My first cobbled together studio consisted of 1/4 inch machines, onto 1/2 inch, and spending alot of time in 2 inch rooms as well. There was a whole lot more pre-planning involved with the track limitations, and time was of the essence knowing how long and expensive it was going to get if you didn’t have your shit together basically.
Nowadays we can experiment endlessly with our unlimited (or close to) track counts, spend weeks editing ‘the perfect take’, recall dozens of mixes with relative ease, and not have to worry about our storage media (tape) wearing out or degrading with every pass. Is this a good thing? Is this progress? I happen to think so. I also think it can paralyze us with indecision if we let it. There are times (especially on a client’s budget) where you might want to give yourself some limitations. Do you really need 30 tracks of that rhythm guitar layered? Probably not. If we always keep in mind to do what’s best for the song, it helps keep focus on the important stuff, and turns our endless options into a few possible choices. Don’t be afraid to give yourself some parameters to work within. Limitations aren’t neccesarily limiting… they actually may open up a few new doors for you. And please… don’t make me go back to tape. I really don’t want to have to edit with razor blades again…
